Header Logo
Keywords
Last Name
Institution
Announcement

You can now add alternative names! Click here to add other names that you've published under.

Megan Smith

Concepts (59)

Concept scores are derived automatically based on a person's publications. Keywords in the their attributed publications are matched to keywords from the National Library of Medicine's controlled vocabulary thesaurus, MeSH (Medical Subject Headings). The strength of a person's concept scores is based not only on the number of corresponding publications, but also how relevant the concepts are to the overall topics of the publications, how long ago the publications were written, whether the person was the first or senior author, and how many other people have written about the topic.Concepts cannot be directly edited. You can help ensure your concepts are accurate by making sure your attributed publications are correct and up-to-date. We recommend checking over your attributed publications list every three to four months.

Concepts are listed by decreasing relevance which is based on many factors, including how many publications the person wrote about that topic, how long ago those publications were written, and how many publications other people have written on that same topic.

Name Number of Publications Most Recent Publication Publications by All Authors Concept Score Why?
Community Pharmacy Services
13
2025
71
6.000
Why?
Pharmacies
10
2025
62
3.940
Why?
Pharmacists
12
2025
155
2.470
Why?
Education, Pharmacy
5
2023
163
2.330
Why?
Medication Therapy Management
5
2019
21
2.220
Why?
Pharmacy
4
2023
55
2.210
Why?
Students, Pharmacy
6
2023
134
2.020
Why?
Delivery of Health Care, Integrated
3
2025
61
1.020
Why?
Community Health Workers
1
2025
62
0.880
Why?
Rural Health Services
1
2025
179
0.790
Why?
Professional Role
5
2019
85
0.540
Why?
Arkansas
5
2025
2068
0.510
Why?
Ethics, Professional
1
2015
9
0.480
Why?
Cooperative Behavior
3
2017
233
0.460
Why?
Models, Organizational
1
2015
58
0.460
Why?
Patient Care
3
2025
59
0.450
Why?
Teaching
1
2015
111
0.440
Why?
Educational Measurement
3
2023
202
0.430
Why?
Ambulatory Care
1
2015
239
0.400
Why?
Humans
19
2025
53230
0.400
Why?
United States
7
2025
5409
0.290
Why?
Curriculum
2
2023
409
0.250
Why?
Program Evaluation
2
2020
359
0.250
Why?
Medicare
2
2018
280
0.230
Why?
Attitude of Health Personnel
3
2017
371
0.220
Why?
Pharmaceutical Services
1
2023
54
0.190
Why?
Self Care
1
2023
136
0.180
Why?
Health Services Accessibility
1
2025
477
0.170
Why?
Rural Population
1
2025
596
0.170
Why?
Pharmacy Service, Hospital
1
2020
18
0.170
Why?
Schools, Pharmacy
2
2023
59
0.160
Why?
North Carolina
2
2017
53
0.160
Why?
Cross-Sectional Studies
2
2023
1723
0.160
Why?
Problem-Based Learning
1
2020
51
0.160
Why?
Workflow
1
2019
53
0.150
Why?
Adult
2
2025
14534
0.140
Why?
Health Care Surveys
1
2017
182
0.120
Why?
Codes of Ethics
1
2015
4
0.120
Why?
Education, Pharmacy, Graduate
1
2016
21
0.120
Why?
Interviews as Topic
1
2017
280
0.120
Why?
Perception
1
2015
124
0.110
Why?
Fellowships and Scholarships
1
2016
124
0.110
Why?
Educational Status
1
2015
229
0.110
Why?
Medicaid
1
2017
294
0.100
Why?
Physicians
1
2017
242
0.100
Why?
Male
3
2025
27435
0.100
Why?
Patient Care Team
1
2015
278
0.100
Why?
Female
3
2025
28782
0.100
Why?
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
1
2015
523
0.090
Why?
Child
1
2023
7379
0.080
Why?
Time Factors
1
2017
2991
0.080
Why?
Retrospective Studies
1
2022
6819
0.080
Why?
Middle Aged
1
2025
13419
0.080
Why?
Aged
1
2018
10429
0.050
Why?
Qualitative Research
1
2025
384
0.050
Why?
Societies, Pharmaceutical
1
2020
15
0.040
Why?
Patient-Centered Care
1
2019
141
0.030
Why?
Interprofessional Relations
1
2017
95
0.030
Why?
Medication Adherence
1
2017
136
0.030
Why?
Smith's Networks
Click the "See All" links for more information and interactive visualizations!
Concepts Expand Description
_
Co-Authors Expand Description
_
Similar People Expand Description
_
Same Department Expand Description