Header Logo
Keywords
Last Name
Institution
Announcement

You can now add alternative names! Click here to add other names that you've published under.

Megan Smith

Concepts (59)

Concept scores are derived automatically based on a person's publications. Keywords in the their attributed publications are matched to keywords from the National Library of Medicine's controlled vocabulary thesaurus, MeSH (Medical Subject Headings). The strength of a person's concept scores is based not only on the number of corresponding publications, but also how relevant the concepts are to the overall topics of the publications, how long ago the publications were written, whether the person was the first or senior author, and how many other people have written about the topic.Concepts cannot be directly edited. You can help ensure your concepts are accurate by making sure your attributed publications are correct and up-to-date. We recommend checking over your attributed publications list every three to four months.

Concepts are listed by decreasing relevance which is based on many factors, including how many publications the person wrote about that topic, how long ago those publications were written, and how many publications other people have written on that same topic.

Name Number of Publications Most Recent Publication Publications by All Authors Concept Score Why?
Community Pharmacy Services
13
2025
71
6.080
Why?
Pharmacies
10
2025
61
3.990
Why?
Pharmacists
12
2025
150
2.530
Why?
Education, Pharmacy
5
2023
156
2.380
Why?
Medication Therapy Management
5
2019
21
2.250
Why?
Pharmacy
4
2023
54
2.250
Why?
Students, Pharmacy
6
2023
130
2.060
Why?
Delivery of Health Care, Integrated
3
2025
51
1.050
Why?
Community Health Workers
1
2025
58
0.900
Why?
Rural Health Services
1
2025
177
0.800
Why?
Professional Role
5
2019
79
0.550
Why?
Arkansas
5
2025
2013
0.520
Why?
Ethics, Professional
1
2015
9
0.490
Why?
Cooperative Behavior
3
2017
224
0.470
Why?
Models, Organizational
1
2015
58
0.460
Why?
Patient Care
3
2025
58
0.450
Why?
Teaching
1
2015
112
0.440
Why?
Educational Measurement
3
2023
196
0.430
Why?
Ambulatory Care
1
2015
238
0.410
Why?
Humans
19
2025
52441
0.400
Why?
United States
7
2025
5215
0.300
Why?
Curriculum
2
2023
406
0.260
Why?
Program Evaluation
2
2020
351
0.250
Why?
Medicare
2
2018
281
0.240
Why?
Attitude of Health Personnel
3
2017
358
0.220
Why?
Pharmaceutical Services
1
2023
52
0.190
Why?
Self Care
1
2023
136
0.190
Why?
Health Services Accessibility
1
2025
444
0.170
Why?
Rural Population
1
2025
587
0.170
Why?
Pharmacy Service, Hospital
1
2020
17
0.170
Why?
Schools, Pharmacy
2
2023
56
0.170
Why?
North Carolina
2
2017
55
0.160
Why?
Cross-Sectional Studies
2
2023
1677
0.160
Why?
Problem-Based Learning
1
2020
49
0.160
Why?
Workflow
1
2019
51
0.150
Why?
Adult
2
2025
14205
0.140
Why?
Health Care Surveys
1
2017
177
0.130
Why?
Education, Pharmacy, Graduate
1
2016
20
0.120
Why?
Codes of Ethics
1
2015
4
0.120
Why?
Interviews as Topic
1
2017
270
0.120
Why?
Perception
1
2015
121
0.110
Why?
Fellowships and Scholarships
1
2016
123
0.110
Why?
Educational Status
1
2015
227
0.110
Why?
Medicaid
1
2017
264
0.110
Why?
Physicians
1
2017
237
0.100
Why?
Male
3
2025
26874
0.100
Why?
Patient Care Team
1
2015
267
0.100
Why?
Female
3
2025
28277
0.100
Why?
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
1
2015
504
0.090
Why?
Child
1
2023
7194
0.080
Why?
Time Factors
1
2017
2987
0.080
Why?
Middle Aged
1
2025
13133
0.080
Why?
Retrospective Studies
1
2022
6694
0.080
Why?
Aged
1
2018
10242
0.050
Why?
Qualitative Research
1
2025
365
0.050
Why?
Societies, Pharmaceutical
1
2020
15
0.040
Why?
Patient-Centered Care
1
2019
141
0.040
Why?
Interprofessional Relations
1
2017
91
0.030
Why?
Medication Adherence
1
2017
133
0.030
Why?
Smith's Networks
Click the "See All" links for more information and interactive visualizations!
Concepts Expand Description
_
Co-Authors Expand Description
_
Similar People Expand Description
_
Same Department Expand Description