 Review Literature as Topic
"Review Literature as Topic" is a descriptor in the National Library of Medicine's controlled vocabulary thesaurus,
MeSH (Medical Subject Headings). Descriptors are arranged in a hierarchical structure,
which enables searching at various levels of specificity.
Published materials which provide an examination of recent or current literature. Review articles can cover a wide range of subject matter at various levels of completeness and comprehensiveness based on analyses of literature that may include research findings. The review may reflect the state of the art. It also includes reviews as a literary form.
| Descriptor ID |
D012196
|
| MeSH Number(s) |
L01.178.682.759
|
| Concept/Terms |
State-of-the-Art Review- State-of-the-Art Review
- Review, State-of-the-Art
- Reviews, State-of-the-Art
- State of the Art Review
- State-of-the-Art Reviews
- State of the Art Reviews
|
Below are MeSH descriptors whose meaning is more general than "Review Literature as Topic".
Below are MeSH descriptors whose meaning is more specific than "Review Literature as Topic".
This graph shows the total number of publications written about "Review Literature as Topic" by people in UAMS Profiles by year, and whether "Review Literature as Topic" was a major or minor topic of these publications.
To see the data from this visualization as text, click here.
| Year | Major Topic | Minor Topic | Total |
|---|
| 2024 | 0 | 1 | 1 | | 2022 | 0 | 1 | 1 | | 2021 | 0 | 1 | 1 | | 2019 | 0 | 1 | 1 | | 2018 | 0 | 2 | 2 | | 2017 | 2 | 2 | 4 | | 2016 | 1 | 0 | 1 | | 2011 | 0 | 1 | 1 | | 2010 | 0 | 1 | 1 | | 2009 | 1 | 0 | 1 | | 1992 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
To return to the timeline, click here.
Below are the most recent publications written about "Review Literature as Topic" by people in Profiles over the past ten years.
-
Stehlik P, Dowsett C, Camacho X, Falster MO, Lim R, Nasreen S, Pratt NL, Pearson SA, Henry D. Evolution of the data and methods in real-world COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness studies on mortality: a scoping review protocol. BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 19; 14(3):e079071.
-
Samanta D. Reply to comments on "A scoping review on cannabidiol therapy in tuberous sclerosis: Current evidence and perspectives for future development". Epilepsy Behav. 2022 06; 131(Pt A):108704.
-
Breman RB, Hamm RF, Callaghan-Koru JA. Letter to the editor of implementation science in response to "Implementation Science in maternity care, A scoping Review" by Dadich, Piper, and Coates (2021). Implement Sci. 2021 08 16; 16(1):79.
-
Kennedy ET, York SC. Commentary on "Moving Toward Excellence in Pediatric Physical Therapy Education: A Scoping Review". Pediatr Phys Ther. 2019 01; 31(1):114.
-
Carlson GM, Dienel GA, Colbran RJ. Introduction to the Thematic Minireview Series: Brain glycogen metabolism. J Biol Chem. 2018 05 11; 293(19):7087-7088.
-
McElfish PA, Ayers BL, Purvis RS, Long CR, Sinclair K, Esquivel M, Steelman SC. Best practices for community-engaged participatory research with Pacific Islander communities in the USA and USAPI: protocol for a scoping review. BMJ Open. 2018 01 24; 8(1):e019653.
-
Long CR, Rowland B, Steelman SC, McElfish PA. Outcomes of disease prevention and management interventions in food pantries and food banks: protocol for a scoping review. BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 05; 7(10):e018022.
-
Shea BJ, Reeves BC, Wells G, Thuku M, Hamel C, Moran J, Moher D, Tugwell P, Welch V, Kristjansson E, Henry DA. AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ. 2017 09 21; 358:j4008.
-
Borah R, Brown AW, Capers PL, Kaiser KA. Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry. BMJ Open. 2017 02 27; 7(2):e012545.
-
Fitzpatrick T, Perrier L, Tricco AC, Straus SE, J?ni P, Zwarenstein M, Lix LM, Smith M, Rosella LC, Henry DA. Protocol for a scoping review of post-trial extensions of randomised controlled trials using individually linked administrative and registry data. BMJ Open. 2017 02 17; 7(2):e013770.
-
Bilandzic A, Fitzpatrick T, Rosella L, Henry D. Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews of Non-Randomized Studies of Adverse Cardiovascular Effects of Thiazolidinediones and Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibitors: Application of a New Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. PLoS Med. 2016 Apr; 13(4):e1001987.
|
People  People who have written about this concept. _
Similar Concepts
People who have written about this concept.
_
Top Journals
Top journals in which articles about this concept have been published.
|