 Connection
Laura Dunn to Ethics, Research
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Laura Dunn has written about Ethics, Research.
|
|
| |
Connection Strength |
|
 |
|
 |
| |
1.464 |
|
|
|
-
Marc-Aurele KL, Steinman SL, Ransom KM, Finer NN, Dunn LB. Evaluation of the content and process of informed consent discussions for neonatal research. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2012 Jul; 7(3):78-83.
Score: 0.425
-
Hickman NJ, Prochaska JJ, Dunn LB. Screening for understanding of research in the inpatient psychiatry setting. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2011 Sep; 6(3):65-72.
Score: 0.401
-
Dunn LB, Kim DS, Fellows IE, Palmer BW. Worth the risk? Relationship of incentives to risk and benefit perceptions and willingness to participate in schizophrenia research. Schizophr Bull. 2009 Jul; 35(4):730-7.
Score: 0.314
-
Bell E, Racine E, Chiasson P, Dufourcq-Brana M, Dunn LB, Fins JJ, Ford PJ, Glannon W, Lipsman N, Macdonald ME, Mathews DJ, McAndrews MP. Beyond consent in research. Revisiting vulnerability in deep brain stimulation for psychiatric disorders. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2014 Jul; 23(3):361-8.
Score: 0.121
-
Saks ER, Dunn LB, Wimer J, Gonzales M, Kim S. Proxy consent to research: the legal landscape. Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics. 2008; 8(1):37-92.
Score: 0.078
-
Dunn LB, Palmer BW, Keehan M, Jeste DV, Appelbaum PS. Assessment of therapeutic misconception in older schizophrenia patients with a brief instrument. Am J Psychiatry. 2006 Mar; 163(3):500-6.
Score: 0.068
-
Barrera AZ, Dunn LB, Nichols A, Reardon S, Mu?oz RF. Getting It "Right". J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2016 10; 11(4):291-298.
Score: 0.036
-
Rabins P, Appleby BS, Brandt J, DeLong MR, Dunn LB, Gabri?ls L, Greenberg BD, Haber SN, Holtzheimer PE, Mari Z, Mayberg HS, McCann E, Mink SP, Rasmussen S, Schlaepfer TE, Vawter DE, Vitek JL, Walkup J, Mathews DJ. Scientific and ethical issues related to deep brain stimulation for disorders of mood, behavior, and thought. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2009 Sep; 66(9):931-7.
Score: 0.022
|
Connection Strength
The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
|