Connection
Laura Dunn to Alzheimer Disease
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Laura Dunn has written about Alzheimer Disease.
|
|
Connection Strength |
|
|
|
|
|
1.557 |
|
|
|
-
Dunn LB, Kim JP, Rostami M, Mondal S, Ryan K, Waraich A, Roberts LW, Palmer BW. Stakeholders' Perspectives regarding Participation in Neuromodulation-Based Dementia Intervention Research. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2022 Feb-Apr; 17(1-2):29-38.
Score: 0.607
-
Dunn LB, Fisher SR, Hantke M, Appelbaum PS, Dohan D, Young JP, Roberts LW. "Thinking about it for somebody else": Alzheimer's disease research and proxy decision makers' translation of ethical principles into practice. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2013 Apr; 21(4):337-45.
Score: 0.329
-
Dunn LB, Hoop JG, Misra S, Fisher SR, Roberts LW. "A feeling that you're helping": proxy decision making for Alzheimer's research. Narrat Inq Bioeth. 2011; 1(2):107-22.
Score: 0.285
-
Palmer BW, Harmell AL, Dunn LB, Kim SY, Pinto LL, Golshan S, Jeste DV. Multimedia Aided Consent for Alzheimer's Disease Research. Clin Gerontol. 2018 Jan-Feb; 41(1):20-32.
Score: 0.115
-
Palmer BW, Harmell AL, Pinto LL, Dunn LB, Kim SY, Golshan S, Jeste DV. Determinants of Capacity to Consent to Research on Alzheimer's disease. Clin Gerontol. 2017; 40(1):24-34.
Score: 0.104
-
Mittal D, Palmer BW, Dunn LB, Landes R, Ghormley C, Beck C, Golshan S, Blevins D, Jeste DV. Comparison of two enhanced consent procedures for patients with mild Alzheimer disease or mild cognitive impairment. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2007 Feb; 15(2):163-7.
Score: 0.054
-
Palmer BW, Dunn LB, Appelbaum PS, Mudaliar S, Thal L, Henry R, Golshan S, Jeste DV. Assessment of capacity to consent to research among older persons with schizophrenia, Alzheimer disease, or diabetes mellitus: comparison of a 3-item questionnaire with a comprehensive standardized capacity instrument. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005 Jul; 62(7):726-33.
Score: 0.049
-
Saks ER, Dunn LB, Wimer J, Gonzales M, Kim S. Proxy consent to research: the legal landscape. Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics. 2008; 8(1):37-92.
Score: 0.014
|
Connection Strength
The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
|