 Connection
Benjamin Amick to Work Capacity Evaluation
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Benjamin Amick has written about Work Capacity Evaluation.
|
|
| |
Connection Strength |
|
 |
|
 |
| |
2.763 |
|
|
|
-
Walker TJ, Tullar JM, Diamond PM, Kohl HW, Amick BC. Validity and Reliability of the 8-Item Work Limitations Questionnaire. J Occup Rehabil. 2017 Dec; 27(4):576-583.
Score: 0.608
-
Tang K, Beaton DE, Hogg-Johnson S, C?t? P, Loisel P, Amick BC. Does the Upper-Limb Work Instability Scale Predict Transitions Out of Work Among Injured Workers? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Sep; 96(9):1658-65.
Score: 0.509
-
Gallasch CH, Alexandre NM, Amick B. Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the work role functioning questionnaire to Brazilian Portuguese. J Occup Rehabil. 2007 Dec; 17(4):701-11.
Score: 0.300
-
Michaelis M, Rieger MA, Burgess S, T?ws V, Abma FI, B?ltmann U, Amick BC, Rothermund E. Evaluation of measurement properties of the German Work Role Functioning Questionnaire. BMC Public Health. 2022 09 15; 22(1):1750.
Score: 0.212
-
Abma F, Bjorner JB, Amick BC, B?ltmann U. Two valid and reliable work role functioning questionnaire short versions were developed: WRFQ 5 and WRFQ 10. J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 01; 105:101-111.
Score: 0.161
-
Walker TJ, Tullar JM, Diamond PM, Kohl HW, Amick BC. Association of Self-Reported Aerobic Physical Activity, Muscle-Strengthening Physical Activity, and Stretching Behavior With Presenteeism. J Occup Environ Med. 2017 05; 59(5):474-479.
Score: 0.146
-
Ramada JM, Serra C, Amick BC, Abma FI, Casta?o JR, Pidemunt G, B?ltmann U, Delclos GL. Reliability and validity of the work role functioning questionnaire (Spanish version). J Occup Rehabil. 2014 Dec; 24(4):640-9.
Score: 0.123
-
Ramada JM, Delclos GL, Amick BC, Abma FI, Pidemunt G, Casta?o JR, B?ltmann U, Serra C. Responsiveness of the Work Role Functioning Questionnaire (Spanish version) in a general working population. J Occup Environ Med. 2014 Feb; 56(2):189-94.
Score: 0.117
-
Ramada JM, Serra C, Amick BC, Casta?o JR, Delclos GL. Cross-cultural adaptation of the Work Role Functioning Questionnaire to Spanish spoken in Spain. J Occup Rehabil. 2013 Dec; 23(4):566-75.
Score: 0.115
-
Tang K, Beaton DE, Amick BC, Hogg-Johnson S, C?t? P, Loisel P. Confirmatory factor analysis of the Work Limitations Questionnaire (WLQ-25) in Workers' Compensation Claimants with chronic upper-limb disorders. J Occup Rehabil. 2013 Jun; 23(2):228-38.
Score: 0.111
-
Abma FI, Amick BC, van der Klink JJ, B?ltmann U. Prognostic factors for successful work functioning in the general working population. J Occup Rehabil. 2013 Jun; 23(2):162-9.
Score: 0.111
-
Amick BC, Gimeno D. Translating research into practice: can we get there from here? Arthritis Rheum. 2005 Dec 15; 53(6):808-9.
Score: 0.066
-
Lerner D, Amick BC, Lee JC, Rooney T, Rogers WH, Chang H, Berndt ER. Relationship of employee-reported work limitations to work productivity. Med Care. 2003 May; 41(5):649-59.
Score: 0.055
-
Johansen T, Lund T, Jensen C, Momsen AH, Eftedal M, ?yeflaten I, Braathen TN, Stapelfeldt CM, Amick B, Labriola M. Cross-cultural adaptation of the Work Role Functioning Questionnaire 2.0 to Norwegian and Danish. Work. 2018; 59(4):471-478.
Score: 0.038
-
Brouwer S, Amick BC, Lee H, Franche RL, Hogg-Johnson S. The Predictive Validity of the Return-to-Work Self-Efficacy Scale for Return-to-Work Outcomes in Claimants with Musculoskeletal Disorders. J Occup Rehabil. 2015 Dec; 25(4):725-32.
Score: 0.033
-
Abma FI, Amick BC, Brouwer S, van der Klink JJ, B?ltmann U. The cross-cultural adaptation of the work role functioning questionnaire to Dutch. Work. 2012; 43(2):203-10.
Score: 0.025
-
Ossmann J, Amick BC, Habeck RV, Hunt A, Ramamurthy G, Soucie V, Katz JN. Management and employee agreement on reports of organizational policies and practices important in return to work following carpal tunnel surgery. J Occup Rehabil. 2005 Mar; 15(1):17-26.
Score: 0.016
-
Durand MJ, Vachon B, Hong QN, Imbeau D, Amick BC, Loisel P. The cross-cultural adaptation of the Work Role Functioning Questionnaire in Canadian French. Int J Rehabil Res. 2004 Dec; 27(4):261-8.
Score: 0.015
|
Connection Strength
The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
|