 Connection
William Ventres to Physician-Patient Relations
This is a "connection" page, showing publications William Ventres has written about Physician-Patient Relations.
|
|
| |
Connection Strength |
|
 |
|
 |
| |
7.600 |
|
|
|
-
Tunzi M, Ventres W. A Reflective Case Study in Family Medicine Advance Care Planning Conversations. J Am Board Fam Med. 2019 Jan-Feb; 32(1):108-114.
Score: 0.590
-
Tunzi M, Ventres W. Family Medicine Ethics: An Integrative Approach. Fam Med. 2018 09; 50(8):583-588.
Score: 0.570
-
Ventres WB. Looking Within: Intentions of Practice for Person-Centered Care. Ann Fam Med. 2017 03; 15(2):171-174.
Score: 0.520
-
Ventres WB. Global Family Medicine: A 'UNIVERSAL' Mnemonic. J Am Board Fam Med. 2017 01 02; 30(1):104-108.
Score: 0.514
-
Ventres WB. Building Power Between Polarities: On the Space-in-Between. Qual Health Res. 2016 Feb; 26(3):345-50.
Score: 0.474
-
Ventres WB. Where I Practice: On the Spaces of Family Medicine. J Am Board Fam Med. 2015 Nov-Dec; 28(6):841-4.
Score: 0.474
-
Ventres WB, Frankel RM. Shared presence in physician-patient communication: A graphic representation. Fam Syst Health. 2015 Sep; 33(3):270-9.
Score: 0.462
-
Ventres W. ABCDE in Clinical Encounters: Presentations of Self in Doctor-Patient Communication. Ann Fam Med. 2015 May-Jun; 13(3):276-8.
Score: 0.458
-
Ventres W. Educating our patients about life and the end of life: toward a pedagogy of dying. J Am Board Fam Med. 2014 Sep-Oct; 27(5):713-6.
Score: 0.437
-
Ventres W. Electronic health records: upsides, downsides, and inside-outsides on the way toward their use in clinical practice. Teach Learn Med. 2013; 25(4):366-8.
Score: 0.390
-
Ventres WB. Electronic health records: can we maximize their benefits and minimize their risks? Acad Med. 2012 Nov; 87(11):1456-7; author reply 1457.
Score: 0.385
-
Ventres WB. How I think: perspectives on process, people, politics, and presence. J Am Board Fam Med. 2012 Nov-Dec; 25(6):930-6.
Score: 0.385
-
Ventres W, Shah A. How do EHRs affect the physician-patient relationship? Am Fam Physician. 2007 May 01; 75(9):1385, 1390.
Score: 0.263
-
Ventres W, Kooienga S, Vuckovic N, Marlin R, Nygren P, Stewart V. Physicians, patients, and the electronic health record: an ethnographic analysis. Ann Fam Med. 2006 Mar-Apr; 4(2):124-31.
Score: 0.242
-
Ventres W, Gobbo R. The A to Z of cross-cultural medicine. Fam Pract Manag. 2005 Jul-Aug; 12(7):57-8.
Score: 0.232
-
Ventres WB. A comment on a comment. Fam Med. 2005 Mar; 37(3):158.
Score: 0.226
-
Ventres W. PRESSS: A New Patient-Centered Name for an Old Problem. J Am Board Fam Med. 2021 Sep-Oct; 34(5):1030-1032.
Score: 0.178
-
Ventres WB. End-of-life decision making. J Gen Intern Med. 1999 Jan; 14(1):68.
Score: 0.148
-
Ventres W, Haq C. Toward a cultural consciousness of self in relationship: from "us and them" to "we". Fam Med. 2014 Oct; 46(9):691-5.
Score: 0.110
-
Ventres WB. Hearing the patient's story: exploring physician-patient communication using narrative case reports. Fam Pract Res J. 1994 Jun; 14(2):139-47.
Score: 0.107
-
Ventres WB. Communicating about resuscitation: problems and prospects. J Am Board Fam Pract. 1993 Mar-Apr; 6(2):137-41.
Score: 0.098
-
Ventres W, Nichter M, Reed R, Frankel R. Do-not-resuscitate discussions: a qualitative analysis. Fam Pract Res J. 1992 Jun; 12(2):157-69.
Score: 0.094
-
Ventres WB, Spencer SS. Doctor-patient communication about resuscitation: 'have you signed an advance directive?'. J Fam Pract. 1991 Jul; 33(1):21-3.
Score: 0.088
-
Ventres W, Gordon P. Communication strategies in caring for the underserved. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 1990; 1(3):305-14.
Score: 0.079
-
Ventres WB, Frankel RM. Ethnography: a stepwise approach for primary care researchers. Fam Med. 1996 Jan; 28(1):52-6.
Score: 0.030
-
Ventres W, Nichter M, Reed R, Frankel R. Limitation of medical care: an ethnographic analysis. J Clin Ethics. 1993; 4(2):134-45.
Score: 0.024
-
Ventres WB. Success strategies. J Am Board Fam Pract. 1992 May-Jun; 5(3):361.
Score: 0.023
|
Connection Strength
The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
|