Connection
Kirk Smith to Imaging, Three-Dimensional
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Kirk Smith has written about Imaging, Three-Dimensional.
|
|
Connection Strength |
|
|
|
|
|
0.359 |
|
|
|
-
Gierada DS, Politte DG, Zheng J, Schechtman KB, Whiting BR, Smith KE, Crabtree T, Kreisel D, Krupnick AS, Patterson GA, Puri V, Meyers BF. Quantitative Computed Tomography Classification of Lung Nodules: Initial Comparison of 2- and 3-Dimensional Analysis. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2016 Jul-Aug; 40(4):589-95.
Score: 0.127
-
Bolton NR, Smith KE, Pilgram TK, Mueller MJ, Bae KT. Computed tomography to visualize and quantify the plantar aponeurosis and flexor hallucis longus tendon in the diabetic foot. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2005 Jun; 20(5):540-6.
Score: 0.059
-
Commean PK, Mueller MJ, Smith KE, Hastings M, Klaesner J, Pilgram T, Robertson DD. Reliability and validity of combined imaging and pressures assessment methods for diabetic feet. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002 Apr; 83(4):497-505.
Score: 0.047
-
Smith KE, Commean PK, Robertson DD, Pilgram T, Mueller MJ. Precision and accuracy of computed tomography foot measurements. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001 Jul; 82(7):925-9.
Score: 0.045
-
Gutekunst DJ, Patel TK, Smith KE, Commean PK, Silva MJ, Sinacore DR. Predicting ex vivo failure loads in human metatarsals using bone strength indices derived from volumetric quantitative computed tomography. J Biomech. 2013 Feb 22; 46(4):745-50.
Score: 0.025
-
Falk D, Hildebolt C, Smith K, Jungers W, Larson S, Morwood M, Sutikna T, Saptomo EW, Prior F. The type specimen (LB1) of Homo floresiensis did not have Laron syndrome. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2009 Sep; 140(1):52-63.
Score: 0.020
-
Falk D, Hildebolt C, Smith K, Morwood MJ, Sutikna T, Wayhu Saptomo E, Prior F. LB1's virtual endocast, microcephaly, and hominin brain evolution. J Hum Evol. 2009 Nov; 57(5):597-607.
Score: 0.019
-
Falk D, Hildebolt C, Smith K, Morwood MJ, Sutikna T, Saptomo EW, Imhof H, Seidler H, Prior F. Brain shape in human microcephalics and Homo floresiensis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Feb 13; 104(7):2513-8.
Score: 0.017
|
Connection Strength
The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
|