 Connection
Ganesh Narayanasamy to Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Ganesh Narayanasamy has written about Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted.
|
|
| |
Connection Strength |
|
 |
|
 |
| |
4.779 |
|
|
|
-
Narayanasamy G, Morrill S, Cousins D, Liu J, Deshazer G, Garner W, Galhardo E, Serletis D, Penagaricano J. Radiosurgery for mesial temporal lobe epilepsy following ROSE trial guidelines - A planning comparison between Gamma Knife, Eclipse, and Brainlab. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019 Oct; 20(10):134-141.
Score: 0.601
-
Buchapudi RR, Manickam R, M R AK, C R TP, Chandraraj V, Pyakuryal A, Narayanasamy G. Physical and Radiobiological Evaluation of Accelerated Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer and Comparison with Short-Term Clinical Outcomes. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2019 08 01; 20(8):2463-2470.
Score: 0.596
-
Narayanasamy G, Desai D, Morrill S, Zhang X, Galhardo E, Maraboyina S, Penagaricano J. Technical Note: A planning technique to lower normal tissue toxicity in lung SBRT plans based on two likely dependent RTOG metrics. Med Phys. 2018 May; 45(5):2325-2328.
Score: 0.542
-
Narayanasamy G, Saenz DL, Defoor D, Papanikolaou N, Stathakis S. Dosimetric validation of Monaco treatment planning system on an Elekta VersaHD linear accelerator. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2017 Nov; 18(6):123-129.
Score: 0.524
-
Narayanasamy G, Zhang X, Meigooni A, Paudel N, Morrill S, Maraboyina S, Peacock L, Penagaricano J. Therapeutic benefits in grid irradiation on Tomotherapy for bulky, radiation-resistant tumors. Acta Oncol. 2017 Aug; 56(8):1043-1047.
Score: 0.504
-
Narayanasamy G, Avila G, Mavroidis P, Papanikolaou N, Gutierrez A, Baacke D, Shi Z, Stathakis S. Comparison of composite prostate radiotherapy plan doses with dependent and independent boost phases. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med. 2016 Sep; 39(3):727-33.
Score: 0.486
-
Narayanasamy G, Zalman T, Ha CS, Papanikolaou N, Stathakis S. Evaluation of Dosimetry Check software for IMRT patient-specific quality assurance. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2015 May 08; 16(3):5427.
Score: 0.444
-
Alexandrian AN, Mavroidis P, Narayanasamy G, McConnell KA, Kabat CN, George RB, Defoor DL, Kirby N, Papanikolaou N, Stathakis S. Incorporating biological modeling into patient-specific plan verification. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2020 Mar; 21(3):94-107.
Score: 0.155
-
Zhang X, Rong Y, Morrill S, Fang J, Narayanasamy G, Galhardo E, Maraboyina S, Croft C, Xia F, Penagaricano J. Robust optimization in lung treatment plans accounting for geometric uncertainty. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2018 May; 19(3):19-26.
Score: 0.135
-
Zhang X, Penagaricano J, Narayanasamy G, Corry P, Liu T, Sanjay M, Paudel N, Morrill S. Helical tomotherapy to LINAC plan conversion utilizing RayStation Fallback planning. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2017 Jan; 18(1):178-185.
Score: 0.125
-
Narayanasamy G, Stathakis S, Gutierrez AN, Pappas E, Crownover R, Floyd JR, Papanikolaou N. A Systematic Analysis of 2 Monoisocentric Techniques for the Treatment of Multiple Brain Metastases. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2017 10; 16(5):639-644.
Score: 0.122
-
Narayanasamy G, Cruz W, Saenz DL, Stathakis S, Papanikolaou N, Kirby N. Effect of electron contamination on in vivo dosimetry for lung block shielding during TBI. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016 05 08; 17(3):486-491.
Score: 0.119
-
Saenz DL, Narayanasamy G, Cruz W, Papanikolaou N, Stathakis S. Pinnacle3 modeling and end-to-end dosimetric testing of a Versa HD linear accelerator with the Agility head and flattening filter-free modes. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016 01 08; 17(1):192-206.
Score: 0.116
-
Boria AJ, Narayanasamy G, Bimali M, Maraboyina S, Kalantari F, Sabouri P, Su Z. Cleaning the dose falloff with low modulation in SBRT lung plans. Biomed Phys Eng Express. 2023 05 04; 9(4).
Score: 0.048
-
Frometa-Castillo T, Pyakuryal A, Narayanasamy G, Wals-Zurita A, Mesbahi A. The use of the normal tissue non-complication probability (NTCP0) in the safety evaluations as a new alternative of assessing the side-effects of the radiation oncology treatments. Int J Radiat Biol. 2023; 99(4):656-662.
Score: 0.046
-
Deshazer G, Narayanasamy G, Bimali M, Galhardo E, Kalantari F, Xia F, Pe?agar?cano J, Morrill S. A dosimetric comparative analysis of Brainlab elements and Eclipse RapidArc for spine SBRT treatment planning. Biomed Phys Eng Express. 2022 02 10; 8(2).
Score: 0.044
-
Desai D, Narayanasamy G, Bimali M, Cordrey I, Elasmar H, Srinivasan S, Johnson EL. Cleaning the dose falloff in lung SBRT plan. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2021 Jan; 22(1):100-108.
Score: 0.041
-
Stathakis S, Narayanasamy G, Licon AL, Myers P, Li Y, Crownover R, Papanikolaou N. A dosimetric comparison between volumetric-modulated arc therapy and dynamic conformal arc therapy in SBRT. J BUON. 2019 Mar-Apr; 24(2):838-843.
Score: 0.036
-
Chao M, Wei J, Narayanasamy G, Yuan Y, Lo YC, Pe?agar?cano JA. Three-dimensional cluster formation and structure in heterogeneous dose distribution of intensity modulated radiation therapy. Radiother Oncol. 2018 May; 127(2):197-205.
Score: 0.034
-
Paudel NR, Narayanasamy G, Han EY, Penagaricano J, Mavroidis P, Zhang X, Pyakuryal A, Kim D, Liang X, Morrill S. Dosimetric and radiobiological comparison for quality assurance of IMRT and VMAT plans. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2017 Sep; 18(5):237-244.
Score: 0.032
-
Stathakis S, Mavroidis P, Narayanasamy G, Markovic M, Myers P, Papanikolaou N. Stereotactic body radiation therapy patient specific quality assurance using a two-dimensional array at extended source to surface distance. J BUON. 2015 Jul-Aug; 20(4):1154-63.
Score: 0.028
|
Connection Strength
The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
|