 Connection
Barry Uretsky to Coronary Thrombosis
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Barry Uretsky has written about Coronary Thrombosis.
|
|
| |
Connection Strength |
|
 |
|
 |
| |
2.048 |
|
|
|
-
Hakeem A, Garg A, Bhatti S, Ahmed Z, Uretsky BF. Fractional flow reserve in acute coronary syndrome: a word of caution. EuroIntervention. 2015 Dec; 11(8):e1-2.
Score: 0.525
-
Kern MJ, Applegate RJ, Bell M, Brilakis ES, Butman SM, Bach RG, Kaul P, Klein LW, Krucoff MW, Moore JA, Price MJ, Rao SV, Stone GW, Uretsky BF. Conversations in cardiology: bridging antiplatelet therapy before surgery. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Apr 01; 83(5):748-52.
Score: 0.460
-
Uretsky BF. Primary PCI for the "late presenter" with STEMI: how late is too late? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Oct 01; 76(4):471-2.
Score: 0.367
-
Uretsky BF. Thrombus aspiration during primary percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med. 2008 Jun 12; 358(24):2639; author reply 2640-1.
Score: 0.313
-
Wang F, Stouffer GA, Waxman S, Uretsky BF. Late coronary stent thrombosis: early vs. late stent thrombosis in the stent era. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2002 Feb; 55(2):142-7.
Score: 0.201
-
Garg R, Uretsky BF, Lev EI. Anti-platelet and anti-thrombotic approaches in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007 Sep; 70(3):388-406.
Score: 0.074
-
Gupta R, Rahman MA, Uretsky BF, Schwarz ER. Left main coronary artery thrombus: a case series with different outcomes. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2005 Apr; 19(2):125-31.
Score: 0.063
-
Latif F, Uyeda L, Edson R, Bhatt DL, Goldman S, Holmes DR, Rao SV, Shunk K, Aggarwal K, Uretsky B, Bolad I, Ziada K, McFalls E, Irimpen A, Truong HT, Kinlay S, Papademetriou V, Velagaleti RS, Rangan BV, Mavromatis K, Shih MC, Banerjee S, Brilakis ES. Stent-Only Versus Adjunctive Balloon Angioplasty Approach for Saphenous Vein Graft Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From DIVA Trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 02; 13(2):e008494.
Score: 0.044
|
Connection Strength
The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
|