Connection
Janet Rader to Fluorodeoxyglucose F18
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Janet Rader has written about Fluorodeoxyglucose F18.
|
|
Connection Strength |
|
|
|
|
|
0.981 |
|
|
|
-
Fracasso PM, Duska LR, Thaker PH, Gao F, Zoberi I, Dehdashti F, Siegel BA, Uliel L, Menias CO, Rehm PK, Goodner SA, Creekmore AN, Lothamer HL, Rader JS. An Exploratory Study of Neoadjuvant Cetuximab Followed by Cetuximab and Chemoradiotherapy in Women With Newly Diagnosed Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer. Am J Clin Oncol. 2022 07 01; 45(7):286-293.
Score: 0.188
-
Zighelboim I, Wright JD, Gao F, Case AS, Massad LS, Mutch DG, Powell MA, Thaker PH, Eisenhauer EL, Cohn DE, Valea FA, Alvarez Secord A, Lippmann LT, Dehdashti F, Rader JS. Multicenter phase II trial of topotecan, cisplatin and bevacizumab for recurrent or persistent cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2013 Jul; 130(1):64-8.
Score: 0.100
-
Kidd EA, Siegel BA, Dehdashti F, Rader JS, Mutch DG, Powell MA, Grigsby PW. Lymph node staging by positron emission tomography in cervical cancer: relationship to prognosis. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Apr 20; 28(12):2108-13.
Score: 0.081
-
Showalter TN, Miller TR, Huettner P, Rader J, Grigsby PW. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography and pathologic tumor size in early-stage invasive cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2009 Nov; 19(8):1412-4.
Score: 0.079
-
Kidd EA, Spencer CR, Huettner PC, Siegel BA, Dehdashti F, Rader JS, Grigsby PW. Cervical cancer histology and tumor differentiation affect 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake. Cancer. 2009 Aug 01; 115(15):3548-54.
Score: 0.077
-
Brooks RA, Rader JS, Dehdashti F, Mutch DG, Powell MA, Thaker PH, Siegel BA, Grigsby PW. Surveillance FDG-PET detection of asymptomatic recurrences in patients with cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2009 Jan; 112(1):104-9.
Score: 0.073
-
Grigsby PW, Watson M, Powell MA, Zhang Z, Rader JS. Gene expression patterns in advanced human cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2006 Mar-Apr; 16(2):562-7.
Score: 0.061
-
Wright JD, Dehdashti F, Herzog TJ, Mutch DG, Huettner PC, Rader JS, Gibb RK, Powell MA, Gao F, Siegel BA, Grigsby PW. Preoperative lymph node staging of early-stage cervical carcinoma by [18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose-positron emission tomography. Cancer. 2005 Dec 01; 104(11):2484-91.
Score: 0.060
-
Lamoreaux WT, Grigsby PW, Dehdashti F, Zoberi I, Powell MA, Gibb RK, Rader JS, Mutch DG, Siegel BA. FDG-PET evaluation of vaginal carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Jul 01; 62(3):733-7.
Score: 0.058
-
Horowitz NS, Dehdashti F, Herzog TJ, Rader JS, Powell MA, Gibb RK, Grigsby PW, Siegel BA, Mutch DG. Prospective evaluation of FDG-PET for detecting pelvic and para-aortic lymph node metastasis in uterine corpus cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2004 Dec; 95(3):546-51.
Score: 0.056
-
Grigsby PW, Siegel BA, Dehdashti F, Rader J, Zoberi I. Posttherapy [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in carcinoma of the cervix: response and outcome. J Clin Oncol. 2004 Jun 01; 22(11):2167-71.
Score: 0.054
-
Cohn DE, Dehdashti F, Gibb RK, Mutch DG, Rader JS, Siegel BA, Herzog TJ. Prospective evaluation of positron emission tomography for the detection of groin node metastases from vulvar cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2002 Apr; 85(1):179-84.
Score: 0.046
-
Kidd EA, Siegel BA, Dehdashti F, Rader JS, Mutic S, Mutch DG, Powell MA, Grigsby PW. Clinical outcomes of definitive intensity-modulated radiation therapy with fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography simulation in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Jul 15; 77(4):1085-91.
Score: 0.020
-
Grigsby PW, Mutch DG, Rader J, Herzog TJ, Zoberi I, Siegel BA, Dehdashti F. Lack of benefit of concurrent chemotherapy in patients with cervical cancer and negative lymph nodes by FDG-PET. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Feb 01; 61(2):444-9.
Score: 0.014
-
Grigsby PW, Singh AK, Siegel BA, Dehdashti F, Rader J, Zoberi I. Lymph node control in cervical cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Jul 01; 59(3):706-12.
Score: 0.014
|
Connection Strength
The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
|