Header Logo
Keywords
Last Name
Institution
Announcement

You can now add alternative names! Click here to add other names that you've published under.

Connection

Everett Magann to Acidosis

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Everett Magann has written about Acidosis.

 
Connection Strength
 
 
 
0.408
 
  1. Magann EF, Chauhan SP, Martin JN. Is amniotic fluid volume status predictive of fetal acidosis at delivery? Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2003 Apr; 43(2):129-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.225
  2. Chauhan SP, Magann EF, Bufin L, Carroll S, Morrison JC. Umbilical arterial pH < 7.00 in newborns delivered by nonelective cesarean delivery: risk factors and peripartum outcomes. Am J Perinatol. 2004 Jul; 21(5):281-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.061
  3. Chauhan SP, Magann EF, Scott JR, Scardo JA, Hendrix NW, Martin JN. Emergency cesarean delivery for nonreassuring fetal heart rate tracings. Compliance with ACOG guidelines. J Reprod Med. 2003 Dec; 48(12):975-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.059
  4. Chauhan SP, Cowan BD, Meydrech EF, Magann EF, Morrison JC, Martin JN. Determination of fetal acidemia at birth from a remote umbilical arterial blood gas analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Jun; 170(6):1705-9; discussion 1709-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  5. Chauhan SP, Mobley JA, Hendrix NW, Magann EF, Devoe LD, Martin JN. Cesarean delivery for suspected fetal distress among preterm parturients. J Reprod Med. 2000 May; 45(5):395-402.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  6. Chauhan SP, Sanderson M, Hendrix NW, Magann EF, Devoe LD. Perinatal outcome and amniotic fluid index in the antepartum and intrapartum periods: A meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Dec; 181(6):1473-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  7. Chauhan SP, Meydrech EF, Morrison JC, Magann EF, Rock WA, Martin JN. Remote umbilical arterial blood pH analysis: accuracy, utility, and limitations. Am J Perinatol. 1997 Jan; 14(1):39-43.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.