 Connection
Everett Magann to Labor, Induced
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Everett Magann has written about Labor, Induced.
|
|
| |
Connection Strength |
|
 |
|
 |
| |
2.051 |
|
|
|
-
Magann EF, Ounpraseuth ST, Miller CD, Novotny SA, Lee NM, Greenfield WW, Morrison JC. Maternal and perinatal outcomes of indicated inductions of labor. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016; 29(14):2240-4.
Score: 0.543
-
Lutgendorf MA, Johnson A, Terpstra ER, Snider TC, Magann EF. Extra-amniotic balloon for preinduction cervical ripening: a randomized comparison of weighted traction versus unweighted. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012 Jun; 25(6):581-6.
Score: 0.406
-
Magann EF, Kinsella MJ, Chauhan SP, McNamara MF, Gehring BW, Morrison JC. Does an amniotic fluid index of
View in: PubMed
Score: 0.175
Bofill JA, Darby MM, Castillo J, Sawardecker SU, Magann EF, Morrison JC. Tachysystole Following Cervical Ripening and Induction of Labor Is Not Associated with Adverse Outcomes. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2017; 82(5):487-493.
Score: 0.147
Hughes DS, Magann EF. Antenatal fetal surveillance "Assessment of the AFV". Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2017 Jan; 38:12-23.
Score: 0.145
Magann EF, Perry KG, Dockery JR, Bass JD, Chauhan SP, Morrison JC. Cervical ripening before medical induction of labor: a comparison of prostaglandin E2, estradiol, and oxytocin. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Jun; 172(6):1702-6; discussion 1704-8.
Score: 0.133
Ennen CS, Bofill JA, Magann EF, Bass JD, Chauhan SP, Morrison JC. Risk factors for cesarean delivery in preterm, term and post-term patients undergoing induction of labor with an unfavorable cervix. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2009; 67(2):113-7.
Score: 0.084
Hill JB, Thigpen BD, Bofill JA, Magann E, Moore LE, Martin JN. A randomized clinical trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus cervical Foley plus oral misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction. Am J Perinatol. 2009 Jan; 26(1):33-8.
Score: 0.084
Magann EF, Evans SF, Weitz B, Newnham J. Antepartum, intrapartum, and neonatal significance of exercise on healthy low-risk pregnant working women. Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Mar; 99(3):466-72.
Score: 0.053
Whittington JR, Ounpraseuth ST, Magann EF, Wendel PJ, Newton L, Morrison JC. A comparison of maternal and perinatal outcomes with vaginal delivery: indicated induction versus spontaneous labor. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 May; 35(10):1929-1934.
Score: 0.047
Magann EF, McNamara MF, Whitworth NS, Chauhan SP, Thorpe RA, Morrison JC. Can we decrease postdatism in women with an unfavorable cervix and a negative fetal fibronectin test result at term by serial membrane sweeping? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Oct; 179(4):890-4.
Score: 0.042
Magann EF, Chauhan SP, Nevils BG, McNamara MF, Kinsella MJ, Morrison JC. Management of pregnancies beyond forty-one weeks' gestation with an unfavorable cervix. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Jun; 178(6):1279-87.
Score: 0.041
Hendrix NW, Chauhan SP, Morrison JC, Magann EF, Martin JN, Devoe LD. Bishop score: a poor diagnostic test to predict failed induction versus vaginal delivery. South Med J. 1998 Mar; 91(3):248-52.
Score: 0.040
Chauhan SP, Magann EF, Perry KG, Naef RW, Washburne JF, Morrison JC. Change in amniotic fluid index after amniotomy during first stage of labor. J Miss State Med Assoc. 1995 Mar; 36(3):61-3.
Score: 0.033
Magann EF, Roberts WE, Perry KG, Chauhan SP, Blake PG, Martin JN. Factors relevant to mode of preterm delivery with syndrome of HELLP (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelets). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Jun; 170(6):1828-32; discussion 1832-4.
Score: 0.031
Chauhan SP, Laye MR, Lutgendorf M, McBurney JW, Keiser SD, Magann EF, Morrison JC. A multicenter assessment of 1,177 cases of shoulder dystocia: lessons learned. Am J Perinatol. 2014 May; 31(5):401-6.
Score: 0.029
Chauhan SP, Grobman WA, Gherman RA, Chauhan VB, Chang G, Magann EF, Hendrix NW. Suspicion and treatment of the macrosomic fetus: a review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Aug; 193(2):332-46.
Score: 0.017
|
Connection Strength
The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
|