Header Logo
Keywords
Last Name
Institution
Announcement

You can now add alternative names! Click here to add other names that you've published under.

Connection

Mark Mennemeier to Perceptual Disorders

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Mark Mennemeier has written about Perceptual Disorders.

 
Connection Strength
 
 
 
1.521
 
  1. Mennemeier M, Pierce CA, Chatterjee A, Anderson B, Jewell G, Dowler R, Woods AJ, Glenn T, Mark VW. Biases in attentional orientation and magnitude estimation explain crossover: neglect is a disorder of both. J Cogn Neurosci. 2005 Aug; 17(8):1194-211.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.267
  2. Mark VW, Woods AJ, Ball KK, Roth DL, Mennemeier M. Disorganized search on cancellation is not a consequence of neglect. Neurology. 2004 Jul 13; 63(1):78-84.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.248
  3. Mennemeier MS, Morris M, Heilman KM. Just thinking about targets can aggravate neglect on cancellation tests. Neurocase. 2004 Feb; 10(1):29-38.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.241
  4. Pierce CA, Jewell G, Mennemeier M. Are psychophysical functions derived from line bisection reliable? J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2003 Jan; 9(1):72-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.223
  5. Mennemeier M, Rapcsak SZ, Pierce C, Vezey E. Crossover by line length and spatial location. Brain Cogn. 2001 Dec; 47(3):412-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.207
  6. Mennemeier M, Rapcsak SZ, Dillon M, Vezey E. A search for the optimal stimulus. Brain Cogn. 1998 Aug; 37(3):439-59.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.164
  7. Woods AJ, Mennemeier M, Garcia-Rill E, Huitt T, Chelette KC, McCullough G, Munn T, Brown G, Kiser TS. Improvement in arousal, visual neglect, and perception of stimulus intensity following cold pressor stimulation. Neurocase. 2012; 18(2):115-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.103
  8. Woods AJ, Mennemeier M, Garcia-Rill E, Meythaler J, Mark VW, Jewel GR, Murphy H. Bias in magnitude estimation following left hemisphere injury. Neuropsychologia. 2006; 44(8):1406-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.069
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.