Connection
Jeffrey Montgomery to Kidney Neoplasms
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Jeffrey Montgomery has written about Kidney Neoplasms.
|
|
Connection Strength |
|
|
|
|
|
2.834 |
|
|
|
-
Ambani SN, Weizer AZ, Wolf JS, He C, Miller DC, Montgomery JS. Matched comparison of robotic vs laparoscopic nephroureterectomy: an initial experience. Urology. 2014 Feb; 83(2):345-9.
Score: 0.404
-
Montgomery JS, Leibovich BC. Lymph node excision for renal cancer. J Urol. 2013 Feb; 189(2):419-21.
Score: 0.375
-
Wolf JS, Dash A, Hollenbeck BK, Johnston WK, Madii R, Montgomery JS. Intermediate followup of hand assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for urothelial carcinoma: factors associated with outcomes. J Urol. 2005 Apr; 173(4):1102-7.
Score: 0.221
-
Simon CT, Skala SL, Weizer AZ, Ambani SN, Chinnaiyan AM, Palapattu G, Hafez K, Magers MJ, Kaffenberger SD, Spratt DE, Montgomery JS, Morgan TM, Udager AM, Lew M, Mehra R. Clinical utility and concordance of upper urinary tract cytology and biopsy in predicting clinicopathological features of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma. Hum Pathol. 2019 04; 86:76-84.
Score: 0.143
-
Hawken SR, Krishnan NK, Ambani SN, Montgomery JS, Caoili EM, Ellis JH, Kunju LP, Hafez KS, Miller DC, Kutikov A, Palapattu GS, Weizer AZ, Stuart Wolf J, Morgan TM. Effect of delayed resection after initial surveillance and tumor growth rate on final surgical pathology in patients with small renal masses (SRMs). Urol Oncol. 2016 11; 34(11):486.e9-486.e15.
Score: 0.123
-
Ambani SN, Morgan TM, Montgomery JS, Gadzinski AJ, Jacobs BL, Hawken S, Krishnan N, Caoili EM, Ellis JH, Kunju LP, Hafez KS, Miller DC, Palapattu GS, Weizer AZ, Wolf JS. Predictors of Delayed Intervention for Patients on Active Surveillance for Small Renal Masses: Does Renal Mass Biopsy Influence Our Decision? Urology. 2016 Dec; 98:88-96.
Score: 0.121
-
Osawa T, Hafez KS, Miller DC, Montgomery JS, Morgan TM, Palapattu GS, Weizer AZ, Caoili EM, Ellis JH, Kunju LP, Wolf JS. Comparison of Percutaneous Renal Mass Biopsy and R.E.N.A.L. Nephrometry Score Nomograms for Determining Benign Vs Malignant Disease and Low-risk Vs High-risk Renal Tumors. Urology. 2016 Oct; 96:87-92.
Score: 0.120
-
Osawa T, Hafez KS, Miller DC, Montgomery JS, Morgan TM, Palapattu GS, Weizer AZ, Caoili EM, Ellis JH, Kunju LP, Wolf JS. Age, Gender and R.E.N.A.L. Nephrometry Score do not Improve the Accuracy of a Risk Stratification Algorithm Based on Biopsy and Mass Size for Assigning Surveillance versus Treatment of Renal Tumors. J Urol. 2016 Mar; 195(3):574-80.
Score: 0.115
-
Udager AM, Pan J, Magers MJ, Palapattu GS, Morgan TM, Montgomery JS, Weizer AZ, Hafez KS, Miller DC, Wolf JS, McHugh JB, Chinnaiyan AM, Dhanasekaran SM, Mehra R. Molecular and immunohistochemical characterization reveals novel BRAF mutations in metanephric adenoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2015 Apr; 39(4):549-57.
Score: 0.111
-
Mukkamala A, He C, Weizer AZ, Hafez KS, Miller DC, Montgomery JS, Bitzer M, Stuart Wolf J. Long-term renal functional outcomes of minimally invasive partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. Urol Oncol. 2014 Nov; 32(8):1247-51.
Score: 0.104
-
Mukkamala A, Allam CL, Ellison JS, Hafez KS, Miller DC, Montgomery JS, Weizer AZ, Wolf JS. Tumor enucleation vs sharp excision in minimally invasive partial nephrectomy: technical benefit without impact on functional or oncologic outcomes. Urology. 2014 Jun; 83(6):1294-9.
Score: 0.103
-
Warrick JI, Tsodikov A, Kunju LP, Chinnaiyan AM, Palapattu GS, Morgan TM, Alva A, Tomlins S, Wu A, Montgomery JS, Hafez KS, Wolf JS, Weizer AZ, Mehra R. Papillary renal cell carcinoma revisited: a comprehensive histomorphologic study with outcome correlations. Hum Pathol. 2014 Jun; 45(6):1139-46.
Score: 0.102
-
Mukkamala A, He C, Weizer AZ, Hafez KS, Miller DC, Montgomery JS, Wolf JS. Long-term oncologic outcomes of minimally invasive partial nephrectomy for renal-cell carcinoma. J Endourol. 2014 Jun; 28(6):649-54.
Score: 0.102
-
Halverson SJ, Kunju LP, Bhalla R, Gadzinski AJ, Alderman M, Miller DC, Montgomery JS, Weizer AZ, Wu A, Hafez KS, Wolf JS. Accuracy of determining small renal mass management with risk stratified biopsies: confirmation by final pathology. J Urol. 2013 Feb; 189(2):441-6.
Score: 0.094
-
Ellison JS, Montgomery JS, Hafez KS, Miller DC, He C, Wolf JS, Weizer AZ. Association of RENAL nephrometry score with outcomes of minimally invasive partial nephrectomy. Int J Urol. 2013 Jun; 20(6):564-70.
Score: 0.094
-
Ellison JS, Montgomery JS, Wolf JS, Hafez KS, Miller DC, Weizer AZ. A matched comparison of perioperative outcomes of a single laparoscopic surgeon versus a multisurgeon robot-assisted cohort for partial nephrectomy. J Urol. 2012 Jul; 188(1):45-50.
Score: 0.091
-
Jacobs BL, Tan HJ, Montgomery JS, Weizer AZ, Wood DP, Miller DC, Wolf JS, Hafez KS. Understanding criteria for surveillance of patients with a small renal mass. Urology. 2012 May; 79(5):1027-32.
Score: 0.090
-
Tan HJ, Jacobs BL, Hafez KS, Montgomery JS, Weizer AZ, Wood DP, Miller DC, Wolf JS. Understanding the role of percutaneous biopsy in the management of patients with a small renal mass. Urology. 2012 Feb; 79(2):372-7.
Score: 0.089
-
Hollingsworth JM, Miller DC, Dunn RL, Montgomery JS, Wolf JS. Cost trends for oncological renal surgery: support for a laparoscopic standard of care. J Urol. 2006 Sep; 176(3):1097-101; discussion 1101.
Score: 0.061
-
Hollingsworth JM, Miller DC, Dunn RL, Montgomery JS, Roberts WW, Hafez KS, Wolf JS. Surgical management of low-stage renal cell carcinoma: Technology does not supersede biology. Urology. 2006 Jun; 67(6):1175-80.
Score: 0.060
-
Johnston WK, Montgomery JS, Seifman BD, Hollenbeck BK, Wolf JS. Fibrin glue v sutured bolster: lessons learned during 100 laparoscopic partial nephrectomies. J Urol. 2005 Jul; 174(1):47-52.
Score: 0.056
-
Johnston WK, Montgomery JS, Wolf JS. Retroperitoneoscopic radical and partial nephrectomy in the patient with cirrhosis. J Urol. 2005 Apr; 173(4):1094-7.
Score: 0.055
|
Connection Strength
The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
|