Connection
Jeffrey Montgomery to Logistic Models
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Jeffrey Montgomery has written about Logistic Models.
|
|
Connection Strength |
|
|
|
|
|
0.198 |
|
|
|
-
Montgomery JS, Johnston WK, Wolf JS. Wound complications after hand assisted laparoscopic surgery. J Urol. 2005 Dec; 174(6):2226-30.
Score: 0.054
-
Stensland KD, Kaffenberger SD, George AK, Morgan TM, Miller DC, Salami SS, Dunn RL, Palapattu GS, Montgomery JS, Hollenbeck BK, Skolarus TA. Prostate cancer clinical trial completion: The role of geography. Contemp Clin Trials. 2021 12; 111:106600.
Score: 0.040
-
Cole AI, Morgan TM, Spratt DE, Palapattu GS, He C, Tomlins SA, Weizer AZ, Feng FY, Wu A, Siddiqui J, Chinnaiyan AM, Montgomery JS, Kunju LP, Miller DC, Hollenbeck BK, Wei JT, Mehra R. Prognostic Value of Percent Gleason Grade 4 at Prostate Biopsy in Predicting Prostatectomy Pathology and Recurrence. J Urol. 2016 08; 196(2):405-11.
Score: 0.027
-
Filson CP, Montgomery JS, Dailey SM, Crossley HS, Lentz H, Tallman CT, He C, Weizer AZ. Complications associated with single-dose, perioperative mitomycin-C for patients undergoing bladder tumor resection. Urol Oncol. 2014 Jan; 32(1):40.e1-8.
Score: 0.023
-
DeLancey JO, Wood DP, He C, Montgomery JS, Weizer AZ, Miller DC, Jacobs BL, Montie JE, Hollenbeck BK, Skolarus TA. Evidence of perineural invasion on prostate biopsy specimen and survival after radical prostatectomy. Urology. 2013 Feb; 81(2):354-7.
Score: 0.022
-
Jacobs BL, Tan HJ, Montgomery JS, Weizer AZ, Wood DP, Miller DC, Wolf JS, Hafez KS. Understanding criteria for surveillance of patients with a small renal mass. Urology. 2012 May; 79(5):1027-32.
Score: 0.021
-
Bennett CL, Price DK, Kim S, Liu D, Jovanovic BD, Nathan D, Johnson ME, Montgomery JS, Cude K, Brockbank JC, Sartor O, Figg WD. Racial variation in CAG repeat lengths within the androgen receptor gene among prostate cancer patients of lower socioeconomic status. J Clin Oncol. 2002 Sep 01; 20(17):3599-604.
Score: 0.011
|
Connection Strength
The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
|