Connection
Mathias Brochhausen to Humans
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Mathias Brochhausen has written about Humans.
|
|
Connection Strength |
|
|
|
|
|
0.281 |
|
|
|
-
Zayas CE, Whorton JM, Sexton KW, Mabry CD, Dowland SC, Brochhausen M. Development and validation of the early warning system scores ontology. J Biomed Semantics. 2023 09 20; 14(1):14.
Score: 0.038
-
Blobel B, Ruotsalainen P, Brochhausen M. Autonomous Systems and Artificial Intelligence - Hype or Prerequisite for P5 Medicine? Stud Health Technol Inform. 2021 Oct 27; 285:3-14.
Score: 0.033
-
Bona JP, Prior FW, Zozus MN, Brochhausen M. Enhancing Clinical Data and Clinical Research Data with Biomedical Ontologies - Insights from the Knowledge Representation Perspective. Yearb Med Inform. 2019 Aug; 28(1):140-151.
Score: 0.029
-
Blobel B, Goossen W, Brochhausen M. Clinical modeling--a critical analysis. Int J Med Inform. 2014 Jan; 83(1):57-69.
Score: 0.019
-
Brochhausen M, Blobel B. Architectural approach for providing relations in biomedical terminologies and ontologies. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2011; 169:739-43.
Score: 0.016
-
Brochhausen M, Spear AD, Cocos C, Weiler G, Mart?n L, Anguita A, Stenzhorn H, Daskalaki E, Schera F, Schwarz U, Sfakianakis S, Kiefer S, D?rr M, Graf N, Tsiknakis M. The ACGT Master Ontology and its applications--towards an ontology-driven cancer research and management system. J Biomed Inform. 2011 Feb; 44(1):8-25.
Score: 0.015
-
Brochhausen M, Slaughter L, Stenzhorn H, Graf N. User-specific perspectives on ontologies. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2010; 156:114-21.
Score: 0.015
-
Smith B, Brochhausen M. Establishing and harmonizing ontologies in an interdisciplinary health care clinical research environment. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2008; 134:219-33.
Score: 0.013
-
Brochhausen M. The derives_from relation in biomedical ontologies. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2006; 124:769-74.
Score: 0.011
-
Blobel B, Oemig F, Ruotsalainen P, Brochhausen M, Giacomini M. The Representational Challenge for Designing and Managing 5P Medicine Ecosystems. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2024 May 23; 314:3-13.
Score: 0.010
-
Bona JP, Utecht J, Bost S, Brochhausen M, Prior F. The PRISM semantic cohort builder: a novel tool to search and access clinical data in TCIA imaging collections. Phys Med Biol. 2022 12 23; 68(1).
Score: 0.009
-
Hoang L, Boyce RD, Bosch N, Stottlemyer B, Brochhausen M, Schneider J. Automatically classifying the evidence type of drug-drug interaction research papers as a step toward computer supported evidence curation. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2020; 2020:554-563.
Score: 0.008
-
Fedorov A, Hancock M, Clunie D, Brochhausen M, Bona J, Kirby J, Freymann J, Pieper S, J W L Aerts H, Kikinis R, Prior F. DICOM re-encoding of volumetrically annotated Lung Imaging Database Consortium (LIDC) nodules. Med Phys. 2020 Nov; 47(11):5953-5965.
Score: 0.008
-
Boyce RD, Ragueneau-Majlessi I, Yu J, Tay-Sontheimer J, Kinsella C, Chou E, Brochhausen M, Judkins J, Gufford BT, Pinkleton BE, Cooney R, Paine MF, McCune JS. Developing User Personas to Aid in the Design of a User-Centered Natural Product-Drug Interaction Information Resource for Researchers. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2018; 2018:279-287.
Score: 0.007
-
Blobel B, Brochhausen M, Ruotsalainen P. Modeling the Personal Health Ecosystem. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2018; 249:3-16.
Score: 0.006
-
Utecht J, Brochhausen M, Judkins J, Schneider J, Boyce RD. Formalizing Evidence Type Definitions for Drug-Drug Interaction Studies to Improve Evidence Base Curation. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017; 245:960-964.
Score: 0.006
-
Hogan WR, Wagner MM, Brochhausen M, Levander J, Brown ST, Millett N, DePasse J, Hanna J. The Apollo Structured Vocabulary: an OWL2 ontology of phenomena in infectious disease epidemiology and population biology for use in epidemic simulation. J Biomed Semantics. 2016 Aug 18; 7:50.
Score: 0.006
-
Hicks A, Hanna J, Welch D, Brochhausen M, Hogan WR. The ontology of medically related social entities: recent developments. J Biomed Semantics. 2016 Jul 12; 7:47.
Score: 0.006
-
Bandrowski A, Brinkman R, Brochhausen M, Brush MH, Bug B, Chibucos MC, Clancy K, Courtot M, Derom D, Dumontier M, Fan L, Fostel J, Fragoso G, Gibson F, Gonzalez-Beltran A, Haendel MA, He Y, Heiskanen M, Hernandez-Boussard T, Jensen M, Lin Y, Lister AL, Lord P, Malone J, Manduchi E, McGee M, Morrison N, Overton JA, Parkinson H, Peters B, Rocca-Serra P, Ruttenberg A, Sansone SA, Scheuermann RH, Schober D, Smith B, Soldatova LN, Stoeckert CJ, Taylor CF, Torniai C, Turner JA, Vita R, Whetzel PL, Zheng J. The Ontology for Biomedical Investigations. PLoS One. 2016; 11(4):e0154556.
Score: 0.006
-
Fransson MN, Rial-Sebbag E, Brochhausen M, Litton JE. Toward a common language for biobanking. Eur J Hum Genet. 2015 Jan; 23(1):22-8.
Score: 0.005
-
Martin L, Anguita A, Graf N, Tsiknakis M, Brochhausen M, R?ping S, Bucur A, Sfakianakis S, Sengstag T, Buffa F, Stenzhorn H. ACGT: advancing clinico-genomic trials on cancer - four years of experience. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2011; 169:734-8.
Score: 0.004
-
Stenzhorn H, Weiler G, Brochhausen M, Schera F, Kritsotakis V, Tsiknakis M, Kiefer S, Graf N. The ObTiMA system - ontology-based managing of clinical trials. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2010; 160(Pt 2):1090-4.
Score: 0.004
-
Wagner M, Breiner T, Betz T, Bernhardt I, P?tz N, Weichert F, Shamaa A, Brochhausen M, Awad S, Richards T, Groh A, Linder R, Landes CA. [Virtual tissue. Quaoaring]. Pathologe. 2008 Nov; 29 Suppl 2:123-8.
Score: 0.003
-
Tsiknakis M, Brochhausen M, Nabrzyski J, Pucacki J, Sfakianakis SG, Potamias G, Desmedt C, Kafetzopoulos D. A semantic grid infrastructure enabling integrated access and analysis of multilevel biomedical data in support of postgenomic clinical trials on cancer. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2008 Mar; 12(2):205-17.
Score: 0.003
-
Weiler G, Brochhausen M, Graf N, Schera F, Hoppe A, Kiefer S. Ontology based data management systems for post-genomic clinical trials within a European Grid Infrastructure for Cancer Research. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2007; 2007:6435-8.
Score: 0.003
|
Connection Strength
The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
|