 Connection
Vladimir Zharov to Photoacoustic Techniques
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Vladimir Zharov has written about Photoacoustic Techniques.
|
|
| |
Connection Strength |
|
 |
|
 |
| |
8.674 |
|
|
|
-
Novoselova MV, Bratashov DN, Sarimollaoglu M, Nedosekin DA, Harrington W, Watts A, Han M, Khlebtsov BN, Galanzha EI, Gorin DA, Zharov VP. Photoacoustic and fluorescent effects in multilayer plasmon-dye interfaces. J Biophotonics. 2019 04; 12(4):e201800265.
Score: 0.629
-
Nedosekin DA, Nolan J, Cai C, Bourdo SE, Nima Z, Biris AS, Zharov VP. In vivo noninvasive analysis of graphene nanomaterial pharmacokinetics using photoacoustic flow cytometry. J Appl Toxicol. 2017 Nov; 37(11):1297-1304.
Score: 0.561
-
Harrington WN, Haji MR, Galanzha EI, Nedosekin DA, Nima ZA, Watanabe F, Ghosh A, Biris AS, Zharov VP. Photoswitchable non-fluorescent thermochromic dye-nanoparticle hybrid probes. Sci Rep. 2016 11 08; 6:36417.
Score: 0.541
-
Cai C, Nedosekin DA, Menyaev YA, Sarimollaoglu M, Proskurnin MA, Zharov VP. Photoacoustic Flow Cytometry for Single Sickle Cell Detection In Vitro and In Vivo. Anal Cell Pathol (Amst). 2016; 2016:2642361.
Score: 0.534
-
Juratli MA, Menyaev YA, Sarimollaoglu M, Siegel ER, Nedosekin DA, Suen JY, Melerzanov AV, Juratli TA, Galanzha EI, Zharov VP. Real-Time Label-Free Embolus Detection Using In Vivo Photoacoustic Flow Cytometry. PLoS One. 2016; 11(5):e0156269.
Score: 0.524
-
Cai C, Carey KA, Nedosekin DA, Menyaev YA, Sarimollaoglu M, Galanzha EI, Stumhofer JS, Zharov VP. In vivo photoacoustic flow cytometry for early malaria diagnosis. Cytometry A. 2016 06; 89(6):531-42.
Score: 0.520
-
Galanzha EI, Viegas MG, Malinsky TI, Melerzanov AV, Juratli MA, Sarimollaoglu M, Nedosekin DA, Zharov VP. In vivo acoustic and photoacoustic focusing of circulating cells. Sci Rep. 2016 Mar 16; 6:21531.
Score: 0.517
-
Galanzha EI, Nedosekin DA, Sarimollaoglu M, Orza AI, Biris AS, Verkhusha VV, Zharov VP. Photoacoustic and photothermal cytometry using photoswitchable proteins and nanoparticles with ultrasharp resonances. J Biophotonics. 2015 Jan; 8(1-2):81-93.
Score: 0.441
-
Foster SR, Galanzha EI, Totten DC, Bene? H, Shmookler Reis RJ, Zharov VP. Photoacoustically-guided photothermal killing of mosquitoes targeted by nanoparticles. J Biophotonics. 2014 Jul; 7(7):465-73.
Score: 0.419
-
Nedosekin DA, Sarimollaoglu M, Galanzha EI, Sawant R, Torchilin VP, Verkhusha VV, Ma J, Frank MH, Biris AS, Zharov VP. Synergy of photoacoustic and fluorescence flow cytometry of circulating cells with negative and positive contrasts. J Biophotonics. 2013 May; 6(5):425-34.
Score: 0.404
-
Galanzha EI, Zharov VP. Photoacoustic flow cytometry. Methods. 2012 Jul; 57(3):280-96.
Score: 0.400
-
Tuchin VV, T?rnok A, Zharov VP. In vivo flow cytometry: a horizon of opportunities. Cytometry A. 2011 Oct; 79(10):737-45.
Score: 0.379
-
Proskurnin MA, Zhidkova TV, Volkov DS, Sarimollaoglu M, Galanzha EI, Mock D, Nedosekin DA, Zharov VP. In vivo multispectral photoacoustic and photothermal flow cytometry with multicolor dyes: a potential for real-time assessment of circulation, dye-cell interaction, and blood volume. Cytometry A. 2011 Oct; 79(10):834-47.
Score: 0.378
-
Nedosekin DA, Khodakovskaya MV, Biris AS, Wang D, Xu Y, Villagarcia H, Galanzha EI, Zharov VP. In vivo plant flow cytometry: a first proof-of-concept. Cytometry A. 2011 Oct; 79(10):855-65.
Score: 0.378
-
Galanzha EI, Zharov VP. In vivo photoacoustic and photothermal cytometry for monitoring multiple blood rheology parameters. Cytometry A. 2011 Oct; 79(10):746-57.
Score: 0.378
-
Galanzha EI, Sarimollaoglu M, Nedosekin DA, Keyrouz SG, Mehta JL, Zharov VP. In vivo flow cytometry of circulating clots using negative photothermal and photoacoustic contrasts. Cytometry A. 2011 Oct; 79(10):814-24.
Score: 0.377
-
Nedosekin DA, Sarimollaoglu M, Ye JH, Galanzha EI, Zharov VP. In vivo ultra-fast photoacoustic flow cytometry of circulating human melanoma cells using near-infrared high-pulse rate lasers. Cytometry A. 2011 Oct; 79(10):825-33.
Score: 0.375
-
Kozlova A, Bratashov D, Grishin O, Abdurashitov A, Prikhozhdenko E, Verkhovskii R, Shushunova N, Shashkov E, Zharov VP, Inozemtseva O. Dynamic blood flow phantom for in vivo liquid biopsy standardization. Sci Rep. 2021 01 13; 11(1):1185.
Score: 0.181
-
Nima ZA, Watanabe F, Jamshidi-Parsian A, Sarimollaoglu M, Nedosekin DA, Han M, Watts JA, Biris AS, Zharov VP, Galanzha EI. Bioinspired magnetic nanoparticles as multimodal photoacoustic, photothermal and photomechanical contrast agents. Sci Rep. 2019 01 29; 9(1):887.
Score: 0.158
-
Nolan J, Sarimollaoglu M, Nedosekin DA, Jamshidi-Parsian A, Galanzha EI, Kore RA, Griffin RJ, Zharov VP. In Vivo Flow Cytometry of Circulating Tumor-Associated Exosomes. Anal Cell Pathol (Amst). 2016; 2016:1628057.
Score: 0.135
-
Nedosekin DA, Juratli MA, Sarimollaoglu M, Moore CL, Rusch NJ, Smeltzer MS, Zharov VP, Galanzha EI. Photoacoustic and photothermal detection of circulating tumor cells, bacteria and nanoparticles in cerebrospinal fluid in vivo and ex vivo. J Biophotonics. 2013 Jun; 6(6-7):523-33.
Score: 0.106
-
Kim JW, Galanzha EI, Zaharoff DA, Griffin RJ, Zharov VP. Nanotheranostics of circulating tumor cells, infections and other pathological features in vivo. Mol Pharm. 2013 Mar 04; 10(3):813-30.
Score: 0.105
-
Galanzha EI, Shashkov E, Sarimollaoglu M, Beenken KE, Basnakian AG, Shirtliff ME, Kim JW, Smeltzer MS, Zharov VP. In vivo magnetic enrichment, photoacoustic diagnosis, and photothermal purging of infected blood using multifunctional gold and magnetic nanoparticles. PLoS One. 2012; 7(9):e45557.
Score: 0.102
-
de la Zerda A, Kim JW, Galanzha EI, Gambhir SS, Zharov VP. Advanced contrast nanoagents for photoacoustic molecular imaging, cytometry, blood test and photothermal theranostics. Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2011 Sep-Oct; 6(5):346-69.
Score: 0.094
-
Nima ZA, Vang KB, Nedosekin D, Kannarpady G, Saini V, Bourdo SE, Majeed W, Watanabe F, Darrigues E, Alghazali KM, Alawajji RA, Petibone D, Ali S, Biris AR, Casciano D, Ghosh A, Salamo G, Zharov V, Biris AS. Quantification of cellular associated graphene and induced surface receptor responses. Nanoscale. 2019 Jan 17; 11(3):932-944.
Score: 0.039
|
Connection Strength
The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
|