Connection
Reid Landes to Tobacco Use Disorder
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Reid Landes has written about Tobacco Use Disorder.
|
|
Connection Strength |
|
|
|
|
|
0.606 |
|
|
|
-
Weidberg S, Landes RD, Garc?a-Rodr?guez O, Yoon JH, Secades-Villa R. Interaction effect of contingency management and sex on delay-discounting changes among treatment-seeking smokers. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2015 Oct; 23(5):361-8.
Score: 0.109
-
Weidberg S, Landes RD, L?pez-N??ez C, Pericot-Valverde I, Gonz?lez-Roz A, Yoon JH, Secades-Villa R. Contingency management effects on delay discounting among patients receiving smoking cessation treatment. Psicothema. 2015; 27(4):309-16.
Score: 0.105
-
Sheffer CE, Christensen DR, Landes R, Carter LP, Jackson L, Bickel WK. Delay discounting rates: a strong prognostic indicator of smoking relapse. Addict Behav. 2014 Nov; 39(11):1682-1689.
Score: 0.100
-
Sheffer C, Stitzer M, Landes R, Brackman SL, Munn T. In-person and telephone treatment of tobacco dependence: a comparison of treatment outcomes and participant characteristics. Am J Public Health. 2013 Aug; 103(8):e74-82.
Score: 0.094
-
Sheffer C, Mackillop J, McGeary J, Landes R, Carter L, Yi R, Jones B, Christensen D, Stitzer M, Jackson L, Bickel W. Delay discounting, locus of control, and cognitive impulsiveness independently predict tobacco dependence treatment outcomes in a highly dependent, lower socioeconomic group of smokers. Am J Addict. 2012 May-Jun; 21(3):221-32.
Score: 0.087
-
Sheffer CE, Stitzer M, Landes R, Brackman SL, Munn T, Moore P. Socioeconomic disparities in community-based treatment of tobacco dependence. Am J Public Health. 2012 Mar; 102(3):e8-16.
Score: 0.085
-
Wilson AG, Franck CT, Mueller ET, Landes RD, Kowal BP, Yi R, Bickel WK. Predictors of delay discounting among smokers: education level and a Utility Measure of Cigarette Reinforcement Efficacy are better predictors than demographics, smoking characteristics, executive functioning, impulsivity, or time perception. Addict Behav. 2015 Jun; 45:124-33.
Score: 0.026
|
Connection Strength
The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
|