Connection
Stephanie Byrum to Proteomics
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Stephanie Byrum has written about Proteomics.
|
|
Connection Strength |
|
|
|
|
|
6.137 |
|
|
|
-
O'Connell KA, Kopchick B, Carlson T, Belardo D, Byrum SD. Understanding proteome quantification in an interactive learning module on Google Cloud Platform. Brief Bioinform. 2024 Jul 23; 25(Supplement_1).
Score: 0.767
-
Graw S, Chappell K, Washam CL, Gies A, Bird J, Robeson MS, Byrum SD. Multi-omics data integration considerations and study design for biological systems and disease. Mol Omics. 2021 04 19; 17(2):170-185.
Score: 0.612
-
Storey AJ, Naceanceno KS, Lan RS, Washam CL, Orr LM, Mackintosh SG, Tackett AJ, Edmondson RD, Wang Z, Li HY, Frett B, Kendrick S, Byrum SD. ProteoViz: a tool for the analysis and interactive visualization of phosphoproteomics data. Mol Omics. 2020 08 01; 16(4):316-326.
Score: 0.572
-
Byrum SD, Loughran AJ, Beenken KE, Orr LM, Storey AJ, Mackintosh SG, Edmondson RD, Tackett AJ, Smeltzer MS. Label-Free Proteomic Approach to Characterize Protease-Dependent and -Independent Effects of sarA Inactivation on the Staphylococcus aureus Exoproteome. J Proteome Res. 2018 10 05; 17(10):3384-3395.
Score: 0.513
-
Byrum SD, Burdine MS, Orr L, Mackintosh SG, Authier S, Pouliot M, Hauer-Jensen M, Tackett AJ. Time- and radiation-dose dependent changes in the plasma proteome after total body irradiation of non-human primates: Implications for biomarker selection. PLoS One. 2017; 12(3):e0174771.
Score: 0.462
-
Byrum SD, Taverna SD, Tackett AJ. Purification of specific chromatin loci for proteomic analysis. Methods Mol Biol. 2015; 1228:83-92.
Score: 0.396
-
Byrum SD, Taverna SD, Tackett AJ. Purification of a specific native genomic locus for proteomic analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013 Nov; 41(20):e195.
Score: 0.361
-
Byrum S, Avaritt NL, Mackintosh SG, Munkberg JM, Badgwell BD, Cheung WL, Tackett AJ. A quantitative proteomic analysis of FFPE melanoma. J Cutan Pathol. 2011 Nov; 38(11):933-6.
Score: 0.313
-
Byrum S, Montgomery CO, Nicholas RW, Suva LJ. The promise of bone cancer proteomics. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010 Mar; 1192:222-9.
Score: 0.283
-
Chappell K, Byrum SD. Understanding PTM Cross Talk Through a Visualization Tool, PTMViz. Methods Mol Biol. 2024; 2836:57-65.
Score: 0.185
-
Seman A, Chandra PK, Byrum SD, Mackintosh SG, Gies AJ, Busija DW, Rutkai I. Targeting mitochondria in the aged cerebral vasculature with SS-31, a proteomic study of brain microvessels. Geroscience. 2023 10; 45(5):2951-2965.
Score: 0.179
-
Rosa F, Zybailov BL, Glazko GV, Rahmatallah Y, Byrum S, Mackintosh SG, Bowlin AK, Yeruva L. Milk Formula Diet Alters Bacterial and Host Protein Profile in Comparison to Human Milk Diet in Neonatal Piglet Model. Nutrients. 2021 Oct 22; 13(11).
Score: 0.159
-
Chappell K, Manna K, Washam CL, Graw S, Alkam D, Thompson MD, Zafar MK, Hazeslip L, Randolph C, Gies A, Bird JT, Byrd AK, Miah S, Byrum SD. Multi-omics data integration reveals correlated regulatory features of triple negative breast cancer. Mol Omics. 2021 10 11; 17(5):677-691.
Score: 0.158
-
Martinez Barrera S, Byrum S, Mackintosh SG, Kozubowski L. Registered report protocol: Quantitative analysis of septin Cdc10-associated proteome in Cryptococcus neoformans. PLoS One. 2020; 15(12):e0242381.
Score: 0.149
-
Storey AJ, Hardman RE, Byrum SD, Mackintosh SG, Edmondson RD, Wahls WP, Tackett AJ, Lewis JA. Accurate and Sensitive Quantitation of the Dynamic Heat Shock Proteome Using Tandem Mass Tags. J Proteome Res. 2020 03 06; 19(3):1183-1195.
Score: 0.141
-
West KL, Byrum SD, Mackintosh SG, Edmondson RD, Taverna SD, Tackett AJ. Proteomic characterization of the arsenic response locus in S. cerevisiae. Epigenetics. 2019 02; 14(2):130-145.
Score: 0.132
-
Zybailov BL, Glazko GV, Rahmatallah Y, Andreyev DS, McElroy T, Karaduta O, Byrum SD, Orr L, Tackett AJ, Mackintosh SG, Edmondson RD, Kieffer DA, Martin RJ, Adams SH, Vaziri ND, Arthur JM. Metaproteomics reveals potential mechanisms by which dietary resistant starch supplementation attenuates chronic kidney disease progression in rats. PLoS One. 2019; 14(1):e0199274.
Score: 0.131
-
Cheema AK, Byrum SD, Sharma NK, Altadill T, Kumar VP, Biswas S, Balgley BM, Hauer-Jensen M, Tackett AJ, Ghosh SP. Proteomic Changes in Mouse Spleen after Radiation-Induced Injury and its Modulation by Gamma-Tocotrienol. Radiat Res. 2018 11; 190(5):449-463.
Score: 0.127
-
Bhattacharyya S, Byrum S, Siegel ER, Suva LJ. Proteomic analysis of bone cancer: a review of current and future developments. Expert Rev Proteomics. 2007 Jun; 4(3):371-8.
Score: 0.058
-
Chen M, Li J, Zhang L, Wang L, Cheng C, Ji H, Altilia S, Ding X, Cai G, Altomare D, Shtutman M, Byrum SD, Mackintosh SG, Feoktistov A, Soshnikova N, Mogila VA, Tatarskiy V, Erokhin M, Chetverina D, Prawira A, Ni Y, Urban S, McInnes C, Broude EV, Roninson IB. CDK8 and CDK19: positive regulators of signal-induced transcription and negative regulators of Mediator complex proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023 08 11; 51(14):7288-7313.
Score: 0.045
-
Batts TL, Sasaki E, Miller M, Sparago J, Bauer RW, Paulsen D, Boudreaux B, Liu CC, Byrum SD, Johnston AN. Neoplastic signatures: Comparative proteomics of canine hepatobiliary neuroendocrine tumors to normal niche tissue. PLoS One. 2023; 18(1):e0280928.
Score: 0.043
-
Vazquez JH, Kennon-McGill S, Byrum SD, Mackintosh SG, Jaeschke H, Williams DK, Lee WM, Dranoff JA, McGill MR. Proteomics Indicates Lactate Dehydrogenase Is Prognostic in Acetaminophen-Induced Acute Liver Failure Patients and Reveals Altered Signaling Pathways. Toxicol Sci. 2022 04 26; 187(1):25-34.
Score: 0.041
-
Kaufmann Y, Byrum SD, Acott AA, Siegel ER, Washam CL, Klimberg VS, Mancino AT. Proteomic profiling of tear fluid as a promising non-invasive screening test for colon cancer. Am J Surg. 2022 07; 224(1 Pt A):19-24.
Score: 0.041
-
Garcia M, Salazar R, Wilson T, Lucas S, Herbert G, Young T, Begay J, Denson JL, Zychowski K, Ashley R, Byrum S, Mackintosh S, Bleske BE, Ottens AK, Campen MJ. Early Gestational Exposure to Inhaled Ozone Impairs Maternal Uterine Artery and Cardiac Function. Toxicol Sci. 2021 01 06; 179(1):121-134.
Score: 0.038
-
Newton J, Brown T, Corley C, Alexander T, Trujillo M, McElroy T, Ntagwabira F, Wang J, Byrum SD, Allen AR. Cranial irradiation impairs juvenile social memory and modulates hippocampal physiology. Brain Res. 2020 12 01; 1748:147095.
Score: 0.037
-
McElroy T, Brown T, Kiffer F, Wang J, Byrum SD, Oberley-Deegan RE, Allen AR. Assessing the Effects of Redox Modifier MnTnBuOE-2-PyP 5+ on Cognition and Hippocampal Physiology Following Doxorubicin, Cyclophosphamide, and Paclitaxel Treatment. Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Mar 09; 21(5).
Score: 0.035
-
Ramirez AM, Byrum SD, Beenken KE, Washam C, Edmondson RD, Mackintosh SG, Spencer HJ, Tackett AJ, Smeltzer MS. Exploiting Correlations between Protein Abundance and the Functional Status of saeRS and sarA To Identify Virulence Factors of Potential Importance in the Pathogenesis of Staphylococcus aureus Osteomyelitis. ACS Infect Dis. 2020 02 14; 6(2):237-249.
Score: 0.035
-
Mao XW, Nishiyama NC, Byrum SD, Stanbouly S, Jones T, Drew A, Sridharan V, Boerma M, Tackett AJ, Zawieja D, Willey JS, Delp M, Pecaut MJ. Characterization of mouse ocular response to a 35-day spaceflight mission: Evidence of blood-retinal barrier disruption and ocular adaptations. Sci Rep. 2019 06 03; 9(1):8215.
Score: 0.034
-
Mao XW, Byrum S, Nishiyama NC, Pecaut MJ, Sridharan V, Boerma M, Tackett AJ, Shiba D, Shirakawa M, Takahashi S, Delp MD. Impact of Spaceflight and Artificial Gravity on the Mouse Retina: Biochemical and Proteomic Analysis. Int J Mol Sci. 2018 Aug 28; 19(9).
Score: 0.032
-
Wang P, Byrum S, Fowler FC, Pal S, Tackett AJ, Tyler JK. Proteomic identification of histone post-translational modifications and proteins enriched at a DNA double-strand break. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017 Nov 02; 45(19):10923-10940.
Score: 0.030
-
Loughran AJ, Gaddy D, Beenken KE, Meeker DG, Morello R, Zhao H, Byrum SD, Tackett AJ, Cassat JE, Smeltzer MS. Impact of sarA and Phenol-Soluble Modulins on the Pathogenesis of Osteomyelitis in Diverse Clinical Isolates of Staphylococcus aureus. Infect Immun. 2016 09; 84(9):2586-94.
Score: 0.028
|
Connection Strength
The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
|