 Connection
Andrew Brown to Reproducibility of Results
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Andrew Brown has written about Reproducibility of Results.
|
|
| |
Connection Strength |
|
 |
|
 |
| |
0.298 |
|
|
|
-
Brown AW, Kaiser KA, Allison DB. Issues with data and analyses: Errors, underlying themes, and potential solutions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 03 13; 115(11):2563-2570.
Score: 0.118
-
Kroeger CM, Ejima K, Hannon BA, Halliday TM, McComb B, Teran-Garcia M, Dawson JA, King DB, Brown AW, Allison DB. Persistent confusion in nutrition and obesity research about the validity of classic nonparametric tests in the presence of heteroscedasticity: evidence of the problem and valid alternatives. Am J Clin Nutr. 2021 03 11; 113(3):517-524.
Score: 0.036
-
Valdez D, Vorland CJ, Brown AW, Mayo-Wilson E, Otten J, Ball R, Grant S, Levy R, Svetina Valdivia D, Allison DB. Improving open and rigorous science: ten key future research opportunities related to rigor, reproducibility, and transparency in scientific research. F1000Res. 2020; 9:1235.
Score: 0.035
-
Ejima K, Brown AW, Schoeller DA, Heymsfield SB, Nelson EJ, Allison DB. Does exclusion of extreme reporters of energy intake (the "Goldberg cutoffs") reliably reduce or eliminate bias in nutrition studies? Analysis with illustrative associations of energy intake with health outcomes. Am J Clin Nutr. 2019 11 01; 110(5):1231-1239.
Score: 0.033
-
Allison DB, Brown AW, George BJ, Kaiser KA. Reproducibility: A tragedy of errors. Nature. 2016 Feb 04; 530(7588):27-9.
Score: 0.026
-
Ivanescu AE, Li P, George B, Brown AW, Keith SW, Raju D, Allison DB. The importance of prediction model validation and assessment in obesity and nutrition research. Int J Obes (Lond). 2016 06; 40(6):887-94.
Score: 0.025
-
Dhurandhar NV, Schoeller D, Brown AW, Heymsfield SB, Thomas D, S?rensen TI, Speakman JR, Jeansonne M, Allison DB. Energy balance measurement: when something is not better than nothing. Int J Obes (Lond). 2015 Jul; 39(7):1109-13.
Score: 0.024
|
Connection Strength
The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
|