Header Logo
Keywords
Last Name
Institution
Announcement

You can now add alternative names! Click here to add other names that you've published under.

Connection

Dina Jones to Cross-Sectional Studies

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Dina Jones has written about Cross-Sectional Studies.

 
Connection Strength
 
 
 
0.276
 
  1. Jones DM, Popova L, Weaver SR, Pechacek TF, Eriksen MP. A National Comparison of Dual Users of Smokeless Tobacco and Cigarettes and Exclusive Cigarette Smokers, 2015-2016. Nicotine Tob Res. 2018 08 14; 20(suppl_1):S62-S70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.123
  2. Spears CA, Jones DM, Weaver SR, Yang B, Pechacek TF, Eriksen MP. Use of and perceptions about electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) among people with mental health conditions or serious psychological distress, 2018. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020 07 01; 212:108049.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  3. Spears CA, Jones DM, Weaver SR, Huang J, Yang B, Pechacek TF, Eriksen MP. Sociodemographic Correlates of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS) Use in the United States, 2016-2017. Am J Public Health. 2019 09; 109(9):1224-1232.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  4. Spears CA, Jones DM, Weaver SR, Yang B, Pechacek TF, Eriksen MP. Electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) use in relation to mental health conditions, past-month serious psychological distress and cigarette smoking status, 2017. Addiction. 2019 02; 114(2):315-325.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  5. Nyman AL, Sterling KL, Majeed BA, Jones DM, Eriksen MP. Flavors and Risk: Perceptions of Flavors in Little Cigars and Cigarillos Among U.S. Adults, 2015. Nicotine Tob Res. 2018 08 14; 20(9):1055-1061.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  6. Wilson KT, Bohnert AE, Ambrose A, Davis DY, Jones DM, Magee MJ. Social, behavioral, and sleep characteristics associated with depression symptoms among undergraduate students at a women's college: a cross-sectional depression survey, 2012. BMC Womens Health. 2014 Jan 13; 14:8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.